Dave Hanson:Mark Warner and Jim Webb represent the citizens of our state, not the state government of Virginia.
My Congressman, Rick Boucher, represents me in Washington. (I'm using the word , "represent," fairly loosely here, but nevertheless, Mr Boucher became my representative by winning the election in my House district.) If Virginia's Senators are also representing me, then either they or Mr. Boucher is(are?) redundant. Oh, I know that the 17th amendment provided for the direct election of Senators, but my argument is that the original intention of the founders of having them appointed by the state legislatures was better and kept power less centralized in Washington. If Senators
do represent the people and not the interests of their respective states, then their total number should be based on population. Why should low population states like Wyoming, Alaska, or Idaho get the same number of Senators as New York and California?
I know that your argument represents the way it has come to be (dare I say, "evolved?"), but my argument is that "the way it is" was not the original intent of the founders.
P.S. Wish I had a nice, soft, cushy job so that I could vacation at will along various sunny coasts.